Talk:Primality by Wilson's theorem: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
 
Line 9: Line 9:
--[[User:DavidFashion|DavidFashion]] ([[User talk:DavidFashion|talk]]) 22:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
--[[User:DavidFashion|DavidFashion]] ([[User talk:DavidFashion|talk]]) 22:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
: Perhaps the title should be changed to "Primal<u>'''i'''</u>ty by Wilson's theorem first? --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 00:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
: Perhaps the title should be changed to "Primal<u>'''i'''</u>ty by Wilson's theorem first? --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 00:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

== Similar less practical tests ==

I'd love to see some of the others:
* Jolivad's Test
* Vantieghem's Test
* Montferrier
* Zsigmondy
* Laurent's Test
* Vecchi
* Latin triangles
--[[User:Billymacc|Billymacc]] ([[User talk:Billymacc|talk]]) 19:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:38, 31 January 2023

1,000th prime?

I think the Perl 6 and Factor examples may be wrong here as, according to an independent source, the 1,000th prime is 7,919 rather than 7,927.--PureFox (talk) 15:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Looks like it was an off-by-one error. --Chunes (talk) 15:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Promote to Task

The task is clearly defined, and several implementations exist. Should be prompted to a task.

--DavidFashion (talk) 22:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps the title should be changed to "Primality by Wilson's theorem first? --Chunes (talk) 00:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Similar less practical tests

I'd love to see some of the others:

  • Jolivad's Test
  • Vantieghem's Test
  • Montferrier
  • Zsigmondy
  • Laurent's Test
  • Vecchi
  • Latin triangles

--Billymacc (talk) 19:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)