Talk:Primality by Wilson's theorem: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→1,000th prime?: yep) |
(→Promote to Task: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think the Perl 6 and Factor examples may be wrong here as, according to [https://www.di-mgt.com.au/primes1000.html an independent source], the 1,000th prime is 7,919 rather than 7,927.--[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 15:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC) |
I think the Perl 6 and Factor examples may be wrong here as, according to [https://www.di-mgt.com.au/primes1000.html an independent source], the 1,000th prime is 7,919 rather than 7,927.--[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 15:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
: Thanks. Looks like it was an off-by-one error. --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 15:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC) |
: Thanks. Looks like it was an off-by-one error. --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 15:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Promote to Task == |
|||
The task is clearly defined, and several implementations exist. Should be prompted to a task. |
|||
--[[User:DavidFashion|DavidFashion]] ([[User talk:DavidFashion|talk]]) 22:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:23, 25 February 2020
1,000th prime?
I think the Perl 6 and Factor examples may be wrong here as, according to an independent source, the 1,000th prime is 7,919 rather than 7,927.--PureFox (talk) 15:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Promote to Task
The task is clearly defined, and several implementations exist. Should be prompted to a task.
--DavidFashion (talk) 22:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)