Talk:Primality by Wilson's theorem: Difference between revisions
(→Promote to Task: new section) |
(→Similar less practical tests: new section) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
--[[User:DavidFashion|DavidFashion]] ([[User talk:DavidFashion|talk]]) 22:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC) |
--[[User:DavidFashion|DavidFashion]] ([[User talk:DavidFashion|talk]]) 22:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
: Perhaps the title should be changed to "Primal<u>'''i'''</u>ty by Wilson's theorem first? --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 00:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
== Similar less practical tests == |
|||
I'd love to see some of the others: |
|||
* Jolivad's Test |
|||
* Vantieghem's Test |
|||
* Montferrier |
|||
* Zsigmondy |
|||
* Laurent's Test |
|||
* Vecchi |
|||
* Latin triangles |
|||
--[[User:Billymacc|Billymacc]] ([[User talk:Billymacc|talk]]) 19:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:38, 31 January 2023
1,000th prime?
I think the Perl 6 and Factor examples may be wrong here as, according to an independent source, the 1,000th prime is 7,919 rather than 7,927.--PureFox (talk) 15:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Promote to Task
The task is clearly defined, and several implementations exist. Should be prompted to a task.
--DavidFashion (talk) 22:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Similar less practical tests
I'd love to see some of the others:
- Jolivad's Test
- Vantieghem's Test
- Montferrier
- Zsigmondy
- Laurent's Test
- Vecchi
- Latin triangles