Talk:Pisano period

From Rosetta Code

Unclear, needs rewording

 Let call pisano, the Pisano period (pisano(2) = 3).

Confused me anyway. I grok π(2)==3 (as one of many) from the wikipedia page, but not entirely sure what the wordage should be here. How about

 Let pisano(n) denote the Pisano period (e.g. pisano(2) is 3).

--Pete Lomax (talk) 03:39, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Much improved, thanks. --Pete Lomax (talk) 12:46, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

I took a stab at trying to clarify the task header a bit. It seems better to me but opinions may differ --Thundergnat (talk) 13:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

I re-introduced coprime and mentioned prime factorisation as they are mentioned on the wp page and seem to be an important part of the calculation. --Paddy3118 (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

I think we must start from 1 to 180 instead of 2 to 180. The clarifications are well done. --Blek (talk) 19:16, 4 March 2020 (UTC)