Anonymous user
Talk:Pi: Difference between revisions
C# version is wrong!
m (added comment about keyboards with no break key. -- ~~~~) |
(C# version is wrong!) |
||
Line 68:
:::Hm. It might be worth scrapping the task and creating more defined ones, such as [[Pi/Bailey-Borwein-Plouffe]], and leave the "Pi/" namespace available to other specific implementations.--[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
:::[[Pi]] can be implemented without use of a spigot algorithm regardless of efficiency, because that algorithm is not good at being efficient at all. The C program I wrote continuous generates Pi digits faster than the unbound spigot, despite the algorithm used was totally unsuitable for the task. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 00:07, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
== C# - incorrect solution ==
The C# version produces output where only first 30% is correct, then goes garbage. For example, here's what it outputs when asked for 50 digits:
3141592653589792800649014751202138549699509907712322
while correct digits are
3141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105.
The D version which uses similar but slightly different algorithm is correct.
--[[User:thedeemon|thedeemon]] 24 October 2012
== Pi vs tau ==
| |||