Anonymous user
Talk:Permutations with some identical elements: Difference between revisions
Talk:Permutations with some identical elements (view source)
Revision as of 23:57, 10 February 2020
, 4 years ago→task wording: a response to uncivil and uncourteous statements.
m (→task wording) |
m (→task wording: a response to uncivil and uncourteous statements.) |
||
Line 25:
(I've added whitespace and used a bigger font to make the subscripts easier to read.) -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 03:51, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
: That is excellent! --[[User:Tobega|Tobega]]
Line 31 ⟶ 32:
:: It's too bad you have such a negative opinion of using larger fonts for mathematical expressions and/or formulae. Try visiting MathWorld™ (and other technical/math/computer science sites) where even more whitespace, larger fonts, and italics are used, not to mention much larger indentations (and more much centering) is used. Most eyes are trained to read text that has mathematical expressions with ''more'' whitespace, not less. Please be more respective of other people's ideas of formula/mathematical expressions and other markups, you must know that people edit things, not to massacre text, but to improve it, and you shouldn't assume that edits were made to make it hideous, in fact, it was quite the opposite. It may not be what you like or even prefer, but other technical websites favor more whitespace and larger fonts to make it easier to read and comprehend. This isn't the place to start with insincere apologies and negativism, with followup of a "please reconsider". Obviously, a lot more thought was put into my suggestions than you realize. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 07:00, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
:::''Try visiting MathWorld''. There is no such hideous useless spacing on MathWorld. Nor anywhere in books or on the web. Why lie when it's so easy to prove you wrong? An [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrimeNumber.html example] maybe? Who are you trying to fool? Did you at least discuss this with the RC community before defacing the site? [[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 19:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
:::: You obviously didn't read or even consider this task's author (Tobega) response (above). Just because you have a different opinion of readability, doesn't give you the right to resort to name calling and offending other people who differ from your opinion as liars. It is this sort of toxic verbiage that can give Rosetta Code a bad name for visitors/contributors to this site. I believe that people who hide behind pseudonyms can/will often behave and act like there're no consequences to egregious words and infantile actions. I prefer to not have to have a discourse with someone who is so uncivil and uncourteous, and who cannot behave oneself on Rosetta Code. I'm asking you to please have some maturity and reconsider before you post anything offensive here on this site. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
== Close to the permutations task ==
| |||