Talk:Percolation/Mean run density: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


:I am no longer confused. Thanksgiving, 2013.
:I am no longer confused. Thanksgiving, 2013.

==== ====

----
From the task description:

:Any calculation of <math>R_n / n</math> for finite <math>n</math> is subject to randomness so should be computed as the average of <math>t</math> runs, where <math>t \ge 100</math>.

In my opinion, this does not really make sense. The result depends only on the product of of <math>t</math> and of <math>n</math>. Therefore you don't need <math>t</math> at all. You actually want to show that the simulation with a small <math>n</math> deviates from the theoretical value. With a large <math>t</math> it doesn't do that anymore.

[[User:Chkas|Chkas]] ([[User talk:Chkas|talk]]) 10:41, 13 June 2023 (UTC)