Anonymous user
Talk:Parsing/RPN to infix conversion: Difference between revisions
Talk:Parsing/RPN to infix conversion (view source)
Revision as of 22:48, 19 December 2011
, 12 years ago→New Input examples: on Minimal parenthesis
m (→Examples Incorrect: Associative Property NE Operator Associativity) |
(→New Input examples: on Minimal parenthesis) |
||
Line 27:
:::::::: Yeah, ''that'' was a bug that needed an extra test case. :-) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:18, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
: Tcl version is now fixed (it would have helped if the original example had been sensitive to such things, but there you go). –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 18:59, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
== On Minimal Parenthesis ==
After finding out the discussions on associativity (above) were working from different definitions, this discussion about parenthesis in the solution may make more sense than it did previously. The removal of the "minimal" from the requirement may have opened up the task to solutions having parenthesis everywhere. While this is certainly unambiguous, it is also just as certainly ugly. I'm not sure this meets the original authors intent and I wish they would chime in here one way or another. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 22:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
== New Input examples ==
| |||