Talk:Parsing/RPN to infix conversion: Difference between revisions

m
(→‎Examples Incorrect: New Input Examples)
Line 12:
::: Recommendation: Replace the example case with one that would exhibit the problem, or add a second example case which would exhibit the problem. Require that the RPN and infix forms expressions evaluate equally. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
:::: I added an extra example, now sadly all the tasks are wrong (although I think a couple already address this). The task already requires the RPN and infix to be the same. One thing, I can't find the template that says (globally) the task changed. So I'll have to mark them all incorrect if I can't find one. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 16:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
== New Input examples ==
See 'Examples Incorrect' above. An example was added to show that associativity is correctly handled. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 16:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Anonymous user