Talk:Pangram checker

From Rosetta Code
Revision as of 15:22, 20 August 2019 by rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger (added a section header to the first topic to properly place the table-of-contents (TOC) --- (this happens more often than one would think).)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

solution for ActionScript?

How about this for the same algorithm as the current ActionScript solution, but coded in a saner manner?

<lang ActionScript>function pangram(k:string):Boolean {

 var lowerK:String = k.toLowerCase();
 var has:Object = {}
 for (var i:Number=0; i<=k.length-1; i++) {
   has[lowerK.charAt(i)] = true;
 var result:Boolean = true;
 for (var ch:String='a'; ch <= 'z'; ch=String.fromCharCode(ch.charCodeAt(0)+1)) {
     result = result && has[ch]
 return result || false;

}</lang> -- Markjreed 20:05, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Since the current implementation admits being barbaric, why not. --Ledrug 20:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Undiscussed deletion (JavaScript) June 5 2016

I notice that a JavaScript example was deleted without discussion on 5 June 2016.
Addition is generally preferable to deletion, particularly where approaches diverge, but more importantly, proposed deletions do need to be motivated and explained here on the discussion page.
Unless there are objections, I propose to restore the alternative version, so that readers are allowed see both approaches Hout (talk) 12:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)