Talk:Palindromic gapful numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→Nice Recursive Solution/Definition: added a rhetorical query.) |
|||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:If we have to, we could probably memoise that stuff in a pretty small cache, rather than repeating divisions all the way down. |
:If we have to, we could probably memoise that stuff in a pretty small cache, rather than repeating divisions all the way down. |
||
:Yes, obviously you need to start hunting above the tens of millions before such optimisations would start to kick in. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 20:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC) |
:Yes, obviously you need to start hunting above the tens of millions before such optimisations would start to kick in. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 20:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
::Above is now embodied in 2nd Phix version, though it turned out far more important for accuracy on stupidly large numbers, than for speed. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 23:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC) |
::Above is now embodied in 2nd Phix version, though it turned out far more important for accuracy on stupidly large numbers, than for speed. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 23:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
::: Does ''stupidly large'' numbers fit somewhere between: |
|||
:::::: gihugeic |
|||
::: and |
|||
:::::: ginormous numbers? -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 01:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) |
|||
==Please clarify== |
==Please clarify== |