Talk:Padovan sequence: Difference between revisions
m
"write-once", Kernighan & Plauger, and granular contrastive insight
m ("write-once", Kernighan & Plauger, and granular contrastive insight) |
|||
Line 97:
:: "''auto-translated''" ? What on earth does that mean to you ? A few years ago you were actually asking for help on Reddit with tracking down a transpiler which you bizarrely imagined I must be using. Are you really drifting back into those fantastical eccentricities again ?
:: "''write-once''" ? Again, I have no idea what this means to you. Perhaps you disagree with Kernighan and Plauger's (The Elements of Programming Style, 1978) advice that we should aim, wherever possible, to write reusable functions ?
:: I personally think that it's not only a '''very''' sound (and very well established) approach, and one which contributes to productivity and code quality, but also happens to be an '''excellent''' match for Rosetta code, aiding contrastive insight at finer levels of granularity.
| |||