Talk:Padovan sequence: Difference between revisions

Hiding behind the personal attacks? Your arguments weakness is left floundering!
(Hiding behind the personal attacks? Your arguments weakness is left floundering!)
Line 73:
 
===A case of déjà vu all over again===
 
:: Thanks Pete Lomax for your attempt at mediation.
:: Hout, in amongst your repeated, tired vitriol, you don't address my accusations that you write in a style for one language and translate to others - and attempt to mask that. ''How else would Haskell type signatures appear in a Python script which has its own typing?''
:: Your Applescript example has similar Haskell signatures as comments.
:: They are comments, so can get through linters, but its not [https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html Python typing]. Its an artifact of your attempts to push a particular style of coding that stands rejected by the Python community. In the past, I seem to remember pointing out that you went as far as to create a function that came as standard in Python but not with the Haskell name. Your flow has improved since then, I think, but you seem to write once in Haskell or whatever, and translate to other languages without leaving explanation that you are doing so, and with the least respect for individual language norms.
 
:: --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 15:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 
I think this issue has been discussed at length, and that the Rosettacode Community has decided that these Python submissions are acceptable. The author of this solution has heard the bully's view and the continuous harassment is bullying, Rosettacode should take action against the bully. How can it be unidiotmatic to write a function in Python? Why is it unidiotmatic if that function is called unfold? I don't understand why a community outside Rosettacode which the bully feels he represents possibly has another option is relevant. Rosettacode should sort this once and for all.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 14:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 
: Thank you Nigel. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 15:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 
: Nigel, On this being discussed and bullying. Hout fails to reply and states he is being bullied whilst ignoring points made. Even deleting them, and name calling. Do you also think it is right for RC to have code written for one language masquerading as being from another? Ignoring that other languages norms, repeatedly?
 
: I don't. Hout fails to argue the point, instead crying bully. Can you not see the name calling?
 
: I don't want RC to be filled with write-once auto-translated examples that may go through a linter, (If he is called on it), but tells you little about each individual language.
 
: Hout, questions posed, or leave the template until this is resolved. You may feel bullied, but that is merely because your way is being questioned.
 
: --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 15:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Anonymous user