Talk:Padovan sequence: Difference between revisions

# "Foolish Consistency" is a direct translation of your own persistent misuse and abuse of the term "idiomatic", which features nowhere in Rosetta Code's own landing-page statement of its goals.

# Because languages are used in varying contexts, and within different traditions of composition (Imperative/Procedural vs Functional being the principle watershed) there will '''always''' be healthy disagreement between contributors to Rosetta Code. I happen, for example to find your Padovan code contrived, clumsy, and unclear. In short, a hack. Your code is also often poorly linted, shedding an ironic light on your hobgoblin misuse of the word "idiomatic". I would have significant misgivings, in a working context, about the reliability and maintainability of your contributions. Your most commonly used submission tag is 'Oops'. I absolutely do '''not''', however, need to express that view on Rosetta Code. All I need to do is to '''enrich''' the Rosetta stock of contrastive insight – "''to aid a person with a grounding in one approach to a problem in learning another''" by contributing alternative versions.