Talk:Padovan sequence: Difference between revisions
m
→Overnight graffiti
Line 51:
# "Foolish Consistency" is a direct translation of your own persistent misuse and abuse of the term "idiomatic", which features nowhere in Rosetta Code's own landing-page statement of its goals.
# Because languages are used in varying contexts, and within different traditions of composition (Imperative/Procedural vs Functional being the principle watershed) there will '''always''' be healthy disagreement between contributors to Rosetta Code. I happen, for example to find your Padovan code contrived, clumsy, and unclear. In short, a hack. Your code is also often poorly linted, shedding an ironic light on your hobgoblin misuse of the word "idiomatic". I would have significant misgivings, in a working context, about the reliability and maintainability of your contributions. Your most commonly used submission tag is 'Oops'. I absolutely do '''not''', however, need to express that view on Rosetta Code. All I need to do is to '''enrich''' the Rosetta stock of contrastive insight – "''to aid a person with a grounding in one approach to a problem in learning another''" by contributing alternative versions.
# Because there will '''always''' be healthy disagreement on Rosetta Code, we '''have to''' rely on scrupulous use of the linter tooling provided by the language communities. Anything beyond that is entirely subjective, completely lacking in objectivity, and risks the rapid backsliding into the childish trolling, and less than innocent bullying, which we are seeing here.
Line 71:
: Perhaps he fears that others will notice that too ? Persistent graffiti and vandalism may not be the best response – they seem more likely to attract attention than to avert it ... [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 13:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
===A case of déjà vu all over again===
I think this issue has been discussed at length, and that the Rosettacode Community has decided that these Python submissions are acceptable. The author of this solution has heard the bully's view and the continuous harassment is bullying, Rosettacode should take action against the bully. How can it be unidiotmatic to write a function in Python? Why is it unidiotmatic if that function is called unfold? I don't understand why a community outside Rosettacode which the bully feels he represents possibly has another option is relevant. Rosettacode should sort this once and for all.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 14:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
| |||