Talk:Padovan sequence: Difference between revisions
→Overnight graffiti
Line 22:
::(and possibly a bit-counter-productive from the perspective of the hostile party – it probably just increases the readership of the ''generic anamorphism'' variant).
:: My instinct would be to delabel, and just leave the flat sequence of alternative drafts intact. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 12:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
::: See below. You can't actually have "no labels", we just need to find useful and inoffensive ones. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 13:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
As I stated on your talk page Hout, and without the personal attacks; One could write a lisp interpreter in Python and create examples for Lisp and a very similar example for Python that would pass a linter, but would not be idiomatic Python.
| |||