Anonymous user
Talk:N-smooth numbers: Difference between revisions
→Disagreement among implementations: fixed the REXX problem.
m (→Disagreement among implementations: reply) |
(→Disagreement among implementations: fixed the REXX problem.) |
||
Line 8:
: The output of REXX for the optional sub-task is indeed incorrect, as some of the values are not really p-smooth. One such example is 38123 = 67 * 569. -- [[User:Trizen|Trizen]] ([[User talk:Trizen|talk]]) 09:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
:: I found the problem. Once the problem was found, it was so obvious. I don't want to go into the embarrassing details, but some of the simplest errors are so easy to overlook. What triggered the ''ah-ha!'' moment was the last line of the 1<sup>st</sup> batch of output, the 10<sup>th</sup> prime (and all others above that) were indexed incorrectly. But thanks for noticing the problem in the output(s). Also, I had also overlooked including the output for the 2<sup>nd</sup> task requirement, which was obviously missing. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 13:01, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
| |||