Talk:MIT/X11 License

From Rosetta Code

Are we using this? --Mwn3d 13:07, 19 January 2008 (MST)

I think a page linked here at one time. I wouldn't say no to having pages for common Open Source(tm)/Shared Source(tm) type licenses, as long as a disclaimer is included in each page. It's on the fringe of Rosetta Code's domain, though. It only makes sense in the context of license issues surrounding applications(mostly language implementations and operating systems) and libraries mentioned on RC. In short, I'm ambivalent on whether we currently need this page. Anyone else have an opinion? --Short Circuit 16:57, 20 January 2008 (MST)