Talk:Last list item: Difference between revisions
Oops
(Responded to Walter.) |
(Oops) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 10:
:The Algol 68 solution has since been changed and so I'd have no objection to removing the sorted versions. However, the task author himself has now added a second 'sorting' version, so I don't know where this leaves us. I guess that, as long as you meet the task requirements, it doesn't really matter if you show other ways of achieving the same result so perhaps it's better just to leave things as they are or to make a 'sorting' version optional? --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 09:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
::Thanks for caring and explaining :-)
::Get vaccinated and stay healthy! --Walter Pachl 10:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
::Thanks but don't blame yourself. When I added the Algol 68 sorted version, every other solution wa a translation of Wren except Ring (and Wren, obviously). --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 12:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
::Note the unsorted requirement didn't come from the task author. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 12:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
::: The unsorted part did come from CalmoSoft, as can be seen in the page history: https://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=Last_list_item&type=revision&diff=345402&oldid=345401 I did however change the wording to be (what I thought was) clearer. --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 12:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
:::My apologies, you are right - I mis-read the history. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 13:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
| |||