Talk:Kaprekar numbers: Difference between revisions
→Testing Common Lisp Contributions
Line 297:
No () use as an empty list.
</pre>
:::From which I and my "antique lisp machine ... installed in your (my) basement" conclude that () may be used as an empty list. Apparently your advanced implementations don't, but this is Lisp for you.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 12:14, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm sure that Nigel will respond to these results in his usual manner: "that is hot air", "all of your implementations are flawed; Mine is the only true Common Lisp", "Surely, you must have my version and Ledrug's version mixed up", or even the classic "Why didn't you just fix my code!" Who knows... I'm sure that it will be amusing though. Therefore, I encourage everyone with a working CL implementation to attempt to compile both versions and post your results. --[[User:Lhignight|Larry Hignight]] 07:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
::Always happy to exceed expectations. If it is amusing you want, let me put another nail in British humour: Do you know the definition of a Yankee?; A bit like a quickie but he does it himself.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 11:12, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
| |||