Talk:Kaprekar numbers: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 183:
:YOUR version is not CORRECT. Anyone can view the history, try the examples above, and see this is true. I left untouched a slower version that solved the 'Extra extra credit' task, which you seem to be obsessed with for some reason. Why you would expect anyone to fix an incorrect, slower, less readable, and less lispy version of your software, when better versions already existed, is way beyond me. --[[User:Lhignight|Larry Hignight]] 01:17, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Now with +SCARY CAPITALS+! I dont't expect anyone to do anything, it was merely a suggestion that you 'put up or shut up'. I modified your solution so that it worked, with sample output provided. If it didn't work for large numbers (ouside the scope of the task) it is probably because your log algorithms are inaccurate. You changed it back to your solution, which doesn't solve the task. Your situation is that ledrug didn't like your solution and has replaced it with his. If you have nothing to put up on the task page then all this is just hot air. None of your comments and insults have indicated that which you wish me to do about your situation. As I said I have a better idea, which I have placed on the task page.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 11:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
:How on earth is something that doesn't work CORRECTLY a better idea! And for the record, Ledrug replaced YOUR version, not mine. --[[User:Lhignight|Larry Hignight]] 08:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 
Well, joining the fray. First, the message left on my user talk page by one genius:
Line 193 ⟶ 194:
 
You are probably not stupid, but it's safe to say you are not the smartest person on RC, by a long shot. And smart people around here tend to have good manners, unlike you or I. Stop treating yourself like you are the one true genius, and try to do something that's helpful to people instead of showing off, OK? (my guess: probably not. Oh well.) --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 00:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
:Well said. He is clearly more interested in being a pompous dick then contributing quality code to RC. --[[User:Lhignight|Larry Hignight]] 08:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Anonymous user