Anonymous user
Talk:Kaprekar numbers: Difference between revisions
→Common Lisp Implementation: Speed.
(Added a talk section for the Common Lisp implementation; Discussed reverting back to an older version of the CL implementation.) |
(→Common Lisp Implementation: Speed.) |
||
Line 163:
Because the new version lacks additional generality beyond the 'slow version', decreases readability and the use of Lisp idioms, and is substantially slower than the previous version, I've decided to revert the changes made by Nigel. I added this talk section to explain my rationale for making the revision. --[[User:Lhignight|Larry Hignight]] 23:40, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
: Hi Lhignight, its good to see your criteria - I hope they are in decreasing order of importance for the general task, as optimising for speed can detract from the other concerns if done to excess - especially if a task can be 'adequately' fulfilled without it. Although you could add another implementation that was faster and leave a more idiomatic example alone. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 16:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
| |||