Talk:Kaprekar numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 195: | Line 195: | ||
You are probably not stupid, but it's safe to say you are not the smartest person on RC, by a long shot. And smart people around here tend to have good manners, unlike you or I. Stop treating yourself like you are the one true genius, and try to do something that's helpful to people instead of showing off, OK? (my guess: probably not. Oh well.) --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 00:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC) |
You are probably not stupid, but it's safe to say you are not the smartest person on RC, by a long shot. And smart people around here tend to have good manners, unlike you or I. Stop treating yourself like you are the one true genius, and try to do something that's helpful to people instead of showing off, OK? (my guess: probably not. Oh well.) --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 00:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Well said. He is clearly more interested in being a pompous dick then contributing quality code to RC. --[[User:Lhignight|Larry Hignight]] 08:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC) |
:Well said. He is clearly more interested in being a pompous dick then contributing quality code to RC. --[[User:Lhignight|Larry Hignight]] 08:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
:There are no stupid people only differently logical. I look forward to seeing this list of rosettacode contributers arranged by smartness that they propose. I assume they exclude themselves from it as judges, and including them would be laughable. The good news for ledrug is that on my list of differently logical contributers, from which I exclude myself as judge, he has been replaced by his new acolyte as first clown.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 11:08, 11 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Again ledrug why so angry? I didn't revert your edit, it is a good solution, I left it there and reinstated my solution which you deleted, as, indeed, it was you who deleted Larry's solution. There are three approaches to this problem which I have identified: |
Again ledrug why so angry? I didn't revert your edit, it is a good solution, I left it there and reinstated my solution which you deleted, as, indeed, it was you who deleted Larry's solution. There are three approaches to this problem which I have identified: |
||