Talk:Kaprekar numbers: Difference between revisions

m
→‎Just for fun: added a new talk section.
m (→‎Just for fun: added a new talk section.)
 
Line 142:
For fun I tried reversing the digits in the squared number (e.g. using "5203" as the "squared number" for 55 instead of "3025") to see if there would be any pattern in the new results. There were some overlaps for numbers that were all repeating digits. I didn't see anything notable. I got 17 rakerpak (kaprekar backwards....get it?) each for base 10 and 17. The code isn't notable either (just add a bit to one line to reverse the string representation of the squared number). I thought it would be kinda neat to think about. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 15:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 
 
----
== ooRexx ==
 
I tried this for ooRexx
Had to change # to n