Anonymous user
Talk:Kaprekar numbers: Difference between revisions
m
→Just for fun: added a new talk section.
(added comments about definition of a "whole number", "natural number", "counting number". -- ~~~~) |
m (→Just for fun: added a new talk section.) |
||
| (34 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
==We've been linked to from a prestigious source==
[http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:
And on this entry [https://oeis.org/A194218 A194218] we get mentioned a second time as a place to compare programs! This is just brilliant to me as I have admired OEIS for what it collates for some time. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 06:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Line 141:
For fun I tried reversing the digits in the squared number (e.g. using "5203" as the "squared number" for 55 instead of "3025") to see if there would be any pattern in the new results. There were some overlaps for numbers that were all repeating digits. I didn't see anything notable. I got 17 rakerpak (kaprekar backwards....get it?) each for base 10 and 17. The code isn't notable either (just add a bit to one line to reverse the string representation of the squared number). I thought it would be kinda neat to think about. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 15:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
== ooRexx ==
I tried this for ooRexx
Had to change # to n
But get a syntax error for j=100000 since s=1E+10
It works with Numeric Digits 14
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 14:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
| |||