Talk:Julia set: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Julia set (view source)

Revision as of 18:33, 12 April 2020

420 bytes added , 4 years ago

m

→‎using different "fineness" when plotting a Julia set: filled in the default values for the output template.

Anonymous user

rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger

Revision as of 02:33, 22 December 2016 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger (added a couple of ASCII plots using different "gradients".)		Latest revision as of 18:33, 12 April 2020 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m (→‎using different "fineness" when plotting a Julia set: filled in the default values for the output template.)
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: ===using different "fineness" when plotting a Julia set=== I was experimenting with different gradients or "  ''fineness"''   when plotting an ASCII version for a Julia set. ~~Here~~Below is a rendition when   '''FINE'''   is specified as   '''5''': (Shown at   <sup>'''1'''</sup>/<sub>'''6'''</sub>   size.) ~~'''~~{{out\|output~~'''~~ \|text=  when using the ~~input~~inputs of:     <tt> ,-0.8 ,  0.156   5 </tt>}} <pre style="font-size:17%"> ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■ ■ Line 206: </pre> ~~Here~~Below is a rendition when   '''FINE'''   is specified as   '''25''': (Shown at   <sup>'''1'''</sup>/<sub>'''6'''</sub>   size.) ~~'''~~{{out\|output~~'''~~ \|text=  when using the ~~input~~inputs of:     <tt> ,-0.8 ,  0.156   25 </tt>}} <pre style="font-size:17%"> ■■ Line 380: ■■ </pre> == task description == Hi. The task is very wide. What do you think about make it more narrow: Make image of Julia set: * for fc(z) = z^2+c where c = -1 ( example value) * using algorithm : LSM/J ( example algorithm ) --[[User:Adam majewski\|Adam majewski]] ([[User talk:Adam majewski\|talk]]) 07:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)