Talk:Inverted index: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Task could be clarified)
 
(type of index)
Line 2: Line 2:


Were we supposed to do an '''inverted file index''' or a '''full inverted index'''? I've implemented both in the Tcl solution even though that does make the code quite a bit more complex (and in production code, I'd use [[SQLite]] with its FTS module as that lets you do all this and more). –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Were we supposed to do an '''inverted file index''' or a '''full inverted index'''? I've implemented both in the Tcl solution even though that does make the code quite a bit more complex (and in production code, I'd use [[SQLite]] with its FTS module as that lets you do all this and more). –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

: Nice job. whatever you did can be a "bonus" task I guess...
: I am not sure I understand. What is a "full inverted index"? <br>
: > production code / fts module <br>
: I just wanted to take away the mystery of search a little.
: Will try to do [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjoint-set_data_structure union-find] soon. --[[User:Tinku99|Tinku99]] 19:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:27, 21 April 2010

Which Kind of Inverted Index?

Were we supposed to do an inverted file index or a full inverted index? I've implemented both in the Tcl solution even though that does make the code quite a bit more complex (and in production code, I'd use SQLite with its FTS module as that lets you do all this and more). –Donal Fellows 09:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Nice job. whatever you did can be a "bonus" task I guess...
I am not sure I understand. What is a "full inverted index"?
> production code / fts module
I just wanted to take away the mystery of search a little.
Will try to do union-find soon. --Tinku99 19:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)