Talk:Gapful numbers: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(bleh. 1e9)
Line 3: Line 3:


:Umm. Well you aren't wrong. Perhaps if I tested from 1e7 instead of the task required 1e6 and 1e9. I think what you really mean is: The REXX version is not testing the correct mandated range. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 13:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
:Umm. Well you aren't wrong. Perhaps if I tested from 1e7 instead of the task required 1e6 and 1e9. I think what you really mean is: The REXX version is not testing the correct mandated range. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 13:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

::I didn't even notice that. The REXX output and task requirements don't agree. This is what happens when Gerard doesn't mandate commas in the output! --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 13:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:26, 10 November 2019

missing output

Both the Perl 6 (Raku) and Python examples are missing 10000003 from their output, which is 13 * 769231. --Chunes (talk) 13:10, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Umm. Well you aren't wrong. Perhaps if I tested from 1e7 instead of the task required 1e6 and 1e9. I think what you really mean is: The REXX version is not testing the correct mandated range. --Thundergnat (talk) 13:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
I didn't even notice that. The REXX output and task requirements don't agree. This is what happens when Gerard doesn't mandate commas in the output! --Chunes (talk) 13:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)