Talk:Four bit adder: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Cleanup: thinking how...) |
|||
Line 9:
: Indeed I did the images thinking to describe the task more in a visual way instead of sticking to notation only...! ;; linked wikipedia gates page to avoid to have to do other images:D, I could add a little "lecture" about boolean notation and gates, but I suppose there must be a limit ;; more easily doable, I will do it (later);; --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 16:48, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
:The images push down into the following code, which looks wrong. I think that entry headers should get the {clear: both} style? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 16:52, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 16:52, 15 June 2010
Cleanup
Some things that ought to be cleaned up in the description of this task:
- Provide some math notation describing the individual gates; that will be of some use to those not accustomed to thinking in schematic gate logic.
- (Maybe?) individual images per-gate. Replace mentions of specific gates with their symbol, or...
- Make gate-specific usages of the words AND, OR, NOT, XOR and their negated counterparts consistent in terms of capitalization and style.
- My embedding job for the images isn't particularly stable, wrt coexistence with the pre blocks, but I don't have time atm to do a nice table for them. Whoever does...thank you? :)
--Michael Mol 13:51, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed I did the images thinking to describe the task more in a visual way instead of sticking to notation only...! ;; linked wikipedia gates page to avoid to have to do other images:D, I could add a little "lecture" about boolean notation and gates, but I suppose there must be a limit ;; more easily doable, I will do it (later);; --ShinTakezou 16:48, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- The images push down into the following code, which looks wrong. I think that entry headers should get the {clear: both} style? --Rdm 16:52, 15 June 2010 (UTC)