Talk:Find palindromic numbers in both binary and ternary bases
Appearance
sneak preview
If anyone is interested in knowing more about palindromic numbers in both binary and ternary bases, here they are.
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ 0 │ │ 1 │ │ 6,643 │ │ 1,422,773 │ │ 5,415,589 │ │ 90,396,755,477 │ │ 381,920,985,378,904,469 │ │ 1,922,624,336,133,018,996,235 │ │ 2,004,595,370,006,815,987,563,563 │ │ 8,022,581,057,533,823,761,829,436,662,099 │ │ 392,629,621,582,222,667,733,213,907,054,116,073 │ │ 32,456,836,304,775,204,439,912,231,201,966,254,787 │ │ 428,027,336,071,597,254,024,922,793,107,218,595,973 │ │ 1,597,863,243,206,403,857,787,246,920,544,522,912,361 │ │ 30,412,638,162,199,251,273,509,758,127,730,300,026,189 │ │ 32,345,684,491,703,244,980,406,880,704,479,906,642,045 │ │ 24,014,998,963,383,302,600,955,162,866,787,153,652,444,049 │ │ ∙ │ │ ∙ │ │ ∙ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
An interesting series, I'm interested if the numbers are more clustered together as the palindromes get ginormous. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 02:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
By clustered, I mean the "jumps" between successive palindromes would be smaller. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 03:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)