Talk:Find palindromic numbers in both binary and ternary bases
sneak preview
If anyone is interested in knowing more about palindromic numbers in both binary and ternary bases, here they are.
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ 0 │ │ 1 │ │ 6,643 │ │ 1,422,773 │ │ 5,415,589 │ │ 90,396,755,477 │ │ 381,920,985,378,904,469 │ │ 1,922,624,336,133,018,996,235 │ │ 2,004,595,370,006,815,987,563,563 │ │ 8,022,581,057,533,823,761,829,436,662,099 │ │ 392,629,621,582,222,667,733,213,907,054,116,073 │ │ 32,456,836,304,775,204,439,912,231,201,966,254,787 │ │ 428,027,336,071,597,254,024,922,793,107,218,595,973 │ │ 1,597,863,243,206,403,857,787,246,920,544,522,912,361 │ │ 30,412,638,162,199,251,273,509,758,127,730,300,026,189 │ │ 32,345,684,491,703,244,980,406,880,704,479,906,642,045 │ │ 24,014,998,963,383,302,600,955,162,866,787,153,652,444,049 │ │ ∙ │ │ ∙ │ │ ∙ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
An interesting series, I'm interested if the numbers are more clustered together as the palindromes get ginormous. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 02:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
By clustered, I mean the "jumps" between successive palindromes would be smaller. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 03:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)