Talk:Feigenbaum constant calculation: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→true value of Feigenbaum's constant: used a different glyph for "eye".) |
m (→true value of Feigenbaum's constant: used a bigger font for the iteration (index).) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==true value of Feigenbaum's constant== |
==true value of Feigenbaum's constant== |
||
Since the true value of Feigenbaum's constant isn't shown here on this Rosetta Code task, I added the displaying of it in the REXX example, along with the displaying of the number of correct decimal digits for each ('''i''') iteration. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 06:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC) |
Since the true value of Feigenbaum's constant isn't shown here on this Rosetta Code task, I added the displaying of it in the REXX example, along with the displaying of the number of correct decimal digits for each (<big>'''i'''</big>) iteration. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 06:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:56, 15 November 2018
Description needed
The task would be improved if there was a clearer description of how to calculate the constant given than the hidden, math-centric Wikipedia text. The target audience are programmers, and a I think a given method of calculation would allow for better comparison of solutions. Paddy3118 (talk) 10:47, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
true value of Feigenbaum's constant
Since the true value of Feigenbaum's constant isn't shown here on this Rosetta Code task, I added the displaying of it in the REXX example, along with the displaying of the number of correct decimal digits for each (i) iteration. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 06:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC)