Talk:Executable library: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (whitespace) |
(→Tcl problem: All sorted) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Tcl problem== |
==Tcl problem== |
||
Oh no, after all the confusion of [[Scripted main]] the Tcl example shows a design pattern that is central to the method, but doesn't follow the task description in a way that I had thought a secondary feature of the task - the two separate files. I won't make any changes just yet, (maybe the Tcl author would like to comment)? But I am aware that although I like what this sets out to do, the explanation might need further clarification. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 06:13, 16 March 2011 (UTC) |
Oh no, after all the confusion of [[Scripted main]] the Tcl example shows a design pattern that is central to the method, but doesn't follow the task description in a way that I had thought a secondary feature of the task - the two separate files. I won't make any changes just yet, (maybe the Tcl author would like to comment)? But I am aware that although I like what this sets out to do, the explanation might need further clarification. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 06:13, 16 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
: I must've been distracted when I wrote it. Corrected. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 11:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:28, 16 March 2011
History
This task came from discussions Here. I was nervous about just deleting all the code for that task so decided to create this, mark the other for maybe future deletion, and see how things go. --Paddy3118 23:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Tcl problem
Oh no, after all the confusion of Scripted main the Tcl example shows a design pattern that is central to the method, but doesn't follow the task description in a way that I had thought a secondary feature of the task - the two separate files. I won't make any changes just yet, (maybe the Tcl author would like to comment)? But I am aware that although I like what this sets out to do, the explanation might need further clarification. --Paddy3118 06:13, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- I must've been distracted when I wrote it. Corrected. –Donal Fellows 11:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)