Talk:Distributed programming: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Done. --[[User:Glennj|glennj]] 16:37, 9 September 2009 (UTC) |
::Done. --[[User:Glennj|glennj]] 16:37, 9 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
:: Part of the problem is that he included the source of a [http://www.autohotkey.com/forum/topic35575.html library] the program depends on. Talked to him on IRC, suggested he use Template:libheader. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 16:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC) |
:: Part of the problem is that he included the source of a [http://www.autohotkey.com/forum/topic35575.html library] the program depends on. Talked to him on IRC, suggested he use Template:libheader. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 16:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::I moved WinSock2.ahk to [[WinSock2.ahk]], is it short enough now to put back in the main page? [[User:BR|BR]] |
:::I moved WinSock2.ahk to [[WinSock2.ahk]], is it short enough now to put back in the main page? [[User:BR|BR]] |
||
Revision as of 17:02, 9 September 2009
I used IRC for the AutoHotkey entry. Is that allowed? BR
- Whether it's allowed or not I think it would be better if it were on its own page (Distributed program/AutoHotkey) and that page simply had a link on this page. --Mwn3d 15:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Done. --glennj 16:37, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Part of the problem is that he included the source of a library the program depends on. Talked to him on IRC, suggested he use Template:libheader. --Michael Mol 16:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- I moved WinSock2.ahk to WinSock2.ahk, is it short enough now to put back in the main page? BR