Talk:Cumulative standard deviation: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
Line 10: Line 10:
:: That should probably have been called a ''method'' rather than a ''function''. Some people can't seem to resist naming it wrongly? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 23:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
:: That should probably have been called a ''method'' rather than a ''function''. Some people can't seem to resist naming it wrongly? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 23:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
::: I would perhaps call it a static function. Shrug. -- [[User:Eriksiers|Erik Siers]] ([[User talk:Eriksiers|talk]]) 03:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
::: I would perhaps call it a static function. Shrug. -- [[User:Eriksiers|Erik Siers]] ([[User talk:Eriksiers|talk]]) 03:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Many examples (too many), have not paid attention to the task description. I've started to mark those but it is a long job... Please remember that if your language cannot match some aspect of the task description then state this clearly, up front and describe what aspects of the task you can follow. (Note, that is if your language cannot do something - not merely if your example does not follow the task). The J language example goes about it in this way, I guess if you had a "pure" functional language that did not allow functions to save state between calls then you might need to explain this at the beginning of your example as well as what compromises this lead to. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 22:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)