Anonymous user
Talk:Comma quibbling: Difference between revisions
m
→missing comma?: added a comment.
m (→missing comma?: added a comment.) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 22:
<br>Note that Bob and Zach are meant to be shown as ''alone'' (as not part of a couple in this case).
<br>-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 09:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
<br>
Also, see: [http://www.verbicidemagazine.com/2011/09/20/strippers-jfk-and-stalin-illustrate-why-you-should-use-the-serial-comma/ visual proof for the need of an Oxford comma]. <br>
-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 00:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
<br>
-----
<br>
Sirs, I covered just this eventuality, methinks by the use of [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/quibble quibbling] in the title ;-)<br>
--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 18:02, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
I too looked at this page to see if there is a discussion of Oxford comma. I prefer the use of Oxford comma, although it is not used in this task; however you could do that some program will have a Oxford variant in addition to the non-Oxford form in case you really like Oxford comma. This is just the idea and is not really the task specification, though. --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 06:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
== missing comma? ==
Let's eat, Grandma.
Let's eat Grandma.
Punctuation saves lives.
-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 13:37, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
| |||