Talk:Classes: Difference between revisions
→The point of the C code?: It only covers encapsulation, which is all the task explicitly requires. Perhaps the task should be deprecated.
(→The point of the C code?: new section) |
(→The point of the C code?: It only covers encapsulation, which is all the task explicitly requires. Perhaps the task should be deprecated.) |
||
Line 13:
Isn't the C sample here a bit useless? After all this work, one ends up with a blob of data, a few functions intended to operator on said data, a lot of ugly long identifiers but no way to do inheritance or polymorphism, because nothing is provided for method dispatching base on type or object. Where's the OO in this? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 22:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
: When I read the task, the requirements boil down to this sentence: "The purpose of this task is to create a basic class with a method, a constructor, an instance variable and how to instantiate it. ". It appears to only cover encapsulation, not polymorphism or inheritance. There's nothing in there about polymorphism or dispatching based on type. However, I think it may be perfectly appropriate to create multiple tasks, one to an aspect of OO, and deprecate this task in favor of them. That's likely to produce far better results. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 10:30, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
| |||