Talk:Check output device is a terminal: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(added an alternative phrasing.)
m (added highlighting and whitespace.)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
:+1 on the name change. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 11:18, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
:+1 on the name change. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 11:18, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


:: How about:     ''Check if output device is a terminal'' ?   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 01:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
:: How about: &nbsp; &nbsp; ''Check &nbsp;<u>&nbsp;if&nbsp;</u> &nbsp;output device is a terminal'' ? &nbsp; -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 01:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:07, 3 March 2021

This might be better named "Check output device is a terminal", or "Check output device is teletype". Rationale: I think we are primarily "checking" device type, rather than "determining what input" or "determining what output" is being obtained or transmitted.

We might be able to merge both the input and output device checks to determine interactivity status. This is just an idea, but it will probably be the way it is implemented in real code.

Markhobley 08:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

+1 on the name change. --Paddy3118 11:18, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
How about:     Check   if   output device is a terminal ?   -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 01:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC)