Anonymous user
Talk:Catmull–Clark subdivision surface: Difference between revisions
Talk:Catmull–Clark subdivision surface (view source)
Revision as of 23:16, 17 August 2011
, 12 years agomove more recent discuss at the end
m (remove non-working OCaml example) |
m (move more recent discuss at the end) |
||
Line 98:
I've tried to improve the description of the algorithm (making it look more like math and less like computer code) but may have made a few bloopers along the way. A full mathematical version would be even better, except that I doubt that most people would immediately pick up the notation for a centroid and so would go horribly astray. Still, if someone can do some more work on it I'd be glad. Note also that neither the Wikipedia article nor this task are particularly good references; for example, the WP article only handles the hole-free mesh case. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 15:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
== Remove non-working OCaml example ==▼
Since nobody seems to be trying to fix the first OCaml example, perhaps it should be removed. Should we check with the original author first? - [[User:TobyK|TobyK]] 17:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC)▼
== Something seems wrong, here ==
Line 174 ⟶ 170:
5 13 25 15;
]
▲== Remove non-working OCaml example ==
▲Since nobody seems to be trying to fix the first OCaml example, perhaps it should be removed. Should we check with the original author first? - [[User:TobyK|TobyK]] 17:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
| |||