Talk:Catmull–Clark subdivision surface: Difference between revisions

 

I've tried to improve the description of the algorithm (making it look more like math and less like computer code) but may have made a few bloopers along the way. A full mathematical version would be even better, except that I doubt that most people would immediately pick up the notation for a centroid and so would go horribly astray. Still, if someone can do some more work on it I'd be glad. Note also that neither the Wikipedia article nor this task are particularly good references; for example, the WP article only handles the hole-free mesh case. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 15:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

 

== Something seems wrong, here ==