Talk:CalmoSoft primes: Difference between revisions
Further comment on timings.
(Replied to Tigerofdarkness.) |
(Further comment on timings.) |
||
Line 20:
::::Just done Go which is coming in at less than 0.3 seconds. I don't know whether they've improved the compiler (now on version 1.20.3) but have been getting some quick results lately. When I have time, I'll update the C version and see how that compares. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 13:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
::::I've updated the C version now and it's 40 ms slower than Go even though the code is basically the same. So maybe the latter is getting faster these days. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 17:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
::I also agree your 250 prime result. I also agree that interpreted languages may struggle to do it in 2 seconds. See the notes on the Algol 68 stretch sample. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 10:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
| |||