Revision as of 13:26, 9 April 2023 (view source) Tigerofdarkness (talk \| contribs) (Reply) ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:03, 9 April 2023 (view source) PureFox (talk \| contribs) (Replied to Tigerofdarkness.) Newer edit →
Line 27: ::::You are right - I've added a fixed version. - the sum is now 72618848632313, which agrees with the Phix sample. ::::Sadly takes somewhat longer than the Wren sample - does the Wren interpreter us a JIT compiler ? --[[User:Tigerofdarkness\|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness\|talk]]) 13:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC) :::::No, there's a single pass compiler which parses the Wren source directly to bytecode (no intermediate AST) which the VM then interprets. A number of devices are used to make Wren faster though I can't see JIT compilation happening as it would make the VM too complicated. --[[User:PureFox\|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox\|talk]]) 14:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Talk:CalmoSoft primes (view source)