Talk:Call a function in a shared library: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(OS) |
(→Categorizing: waiting for more ideas about this task then) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Categorizing=== |
===Categorizing=== |
||
Since this is a heavily [[OS]]-specific task, I suggest it should be split into subtasks for each of the operating systems listed under [[OS]]. BTW, why [[POSIX]] is not under [[OS]]? It should be a subcategory "OS interfaces" or alike there, I guess. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 17:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC) |
Since this is a heavily [[OS]]-specific task, I suggest it should be split into subtasks for each of the operating systems listed under [[OS]]. BTW, why [[POSIX]] is not under [[OS]]? It should be a subcategory "OS interfaces" or alike there, I guess. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 17:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
: I've picked this task from the Request a task page and honestly have not thought too deeply about availability for all systems or languages (e.g. ... Perl on "POSIX" systems maybe can access the same dl* functions as C, but it can also try to load a module instead... which is not a shared library in a broad sense, but to Perl-POV could be more reasonable than the concept of (system specific) shared library)... --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 18:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:17, 6 March 2009
Categorizing
Since this is a heavily OS-specific task, I suggest it should be split into subtasks for each of the operating systems listed under OS. BTW, why POSIX is not under OS? It should be a subcategory "OS interfaces" or alike there, I guess. --Dmitry-kazakov 17:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've picked this task from the Request a task page and honestly have not thought too deeply about availability for all systems or languages (e.g. ... Perl on "POSIX" systems maybe can access the same dl* functions as C, but it can also try to load a module instead... which is not a shared library in a broad sense, but to Perl-POV could be more reasonable than the concept of (system specific) shared library)... --ShinTakezou 18:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)