Talk:Calendar - for "REAL" programmers: Difference between revisions

m
m (NevilleDNZ moved page Talk:Calendar - for "real" programmers to Talk:Calendar - for "REAL" programmers: Somehow - in concordance to the tongue-in-cheek nature of this page - a page rename seems like a REAL good idea.)
Line 56:
Actually - kind of - I agree with you... 6-bit is the criteria. Although I have never heard of a strictly lower case hardware platform.
 
:I think that is because older devices such as the teletype ksr-33 (or a selectric with an APL type ball or any of a variety of others) would only print upper case. (The teletype handled ascii but lower case letters looked like upper case characters. TheThen there were several systems for encoding selectric characters (e.g. tilt/rotate codes).) Meanwhile, there are numerous systems for dealing with mis-matched character set issues. It gets crazy. And I suspect there might be a reason people adopted full ASCII (with lower case) despite the too numerous alternatives. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 14:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 
BTW: The first time I encountered such a computer, it was a [[wp:Prime Computer|Pr1me]] I remember trying being rather bamboozled about how to get the damned thing out of uppercase, including looking for a toggle under the keyboard. It took a little while to dawn on me that it could ''only'' '''do''' upper case. The [[wp:ZX80|ZX80]] code was also UPPERCASE, the ZX was so nice to program that the UPPERCASE restriction didn't seem to matter.
6,951

edits