Anonymous user
Talk:Calendar - for "REAL" programmers: Difference between revisions
Talk:Calendar - for "REAL" programmers (view source)
Revision as of 05:55, 31 May 2011
, 12 years ago→[[Talk:Calendar_-_for_"real"_programmers#Discussion Cont.]]
(→Examples: Discussion.) |
|||
Line 42:
Calendar specifically is an algorithm that is sufficiently complex that it requires assorted flow control, and I/O making is a reasonable example of how to work on a 6-bit character platform. CALENDAR also is specifically and uniquely relevant has it refers back the original "REAL" programmer.
I look forward to your <s>decision</s> discussion.
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 05:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
=== Discussion Cont.===
:Not decision, discussion. And you`ve made a great case! --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Secretly I'm looking forward to the [[wp:Qubit#Bit_versus_qubit|Qubit]] computers... When 32-bit and 64-bit computers will become old hat. :-) [[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 05:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
| |||