Talk:Calendar - for "REAL" programmers: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(→‎Examples: Discussion.)
Line 42: Line 42:
Calendar specifically is an algorithm that is sufficiently complex that it requires assorted flow control, and I/O making is a reasonable example of how to work on a 6-bit character platform. CALENDAR also is specifically and uniquely relevant has it refers back the original "REAL" programmer.
Calendar specifically is an algorithm that is sufficiently complex that it requires assorted flow control, and I/O making is a reasonable example of how to work on a 6-bit character platform. CALENDAR also is specifically and uniquely relevant has it refers back the original "REAL" programmer.


I look forward to your decision.
I look forward to your <s>decision</s> discussion.


[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 05:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 05:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
=== Discussion Cont.===
:Not decision, discussion. And you`ve made a great case! --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
:Not decision, discussion. And you`ve made a great case! --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Secretly I'm looking forward to the [[wp:Qubit#Bit_versus_qubit|Qubit]] computers... When 32-bit and 64-bit computers will become old hat. :-) [[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 05:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)