Talk:Bitmap: Difference between revisions

→‎Amount of comments: Comments are good, code golf is not (on this site...)
(→‎Amount of comments: On comments)
(→‎Amount of comments: Comments are good, code golf is not (on this site...))
Line 39:
 
:: Having an explanation of the spec as it applies to the language provides context and therefore improves that solution's readability and accessability by providing context, which is always a good thing. The task description doesn't require the documenting of the solution's code with respect to the defined spec, and there's no sitewide policy demanding it, so that documentation isn't required. That doesn't mean it's unwise. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 05:01, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 
::: I'd note that when doing several of the tasks, I've had to push my knowledge of my [[Tcl|chosen language]] quite hard and even on occasion learn a new library. But in all cases, the perfect solution is one that other users of the site can quickly read, understand, and learn to replicate, and not the shortest answer. After all, we're not playing Code Golf. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 15:56, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Anonymous user