Talk:Babbage problem

From Rosetta Code
Revision as of 01:18, 13 April 2016 by rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger (added a talk page.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

task clarification

I can only assume that a   positive integer   is meant to be found,   otherwise finding the   smallest negative integer   would be pointless.


How about:

-99,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,025,264


And, in the hinterlands of the Rosetta Code coders, it was heard:   Oh yeah?   my   googolplex thingy is bigger than   your   googolplex thingy.   So there!

-- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 01:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)