Talk:Almost prime: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Perl 6: Re: solution with identical output based on the <tt>factors</tt> routine== |
==Perl 6: Re: solution with identical output based on the <tt>factors</tt> routine== |
||
Hi I was wondering if there is any import or using type statement together with saving factors in a specific named file needed to grant access to factors for the extra code shown or whether the shown code is to be added to the code for factors to get the output. If there is more then could you state it in the intro to the code? Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hi I was wondering if there is any import or using type statement together with saving factors in a specific named file needed to grant access to factors for the extra code shown or whether the shown code is to be added to the code for factors to get the output. If there is more then could you state it in the intro to the code? Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Fair enough. Currently just hand inclusion, but expected to change. --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady|talk]]) 01:09, 24 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:09, 24 February 2014
Perl 6: Re: solution with identical output based on the factors routine
Hi I was wondering if there is any import or using type statement together with saving factors in a specific named file needed to grant access to factors for the extra code shown or whether the shown code is to be added to the code for factors to get the output. If there is more then could you state it in the intro to the code? Thanks. --Paddy3118 (talk) 22:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)