Talk:A+B: Revision history

5 October 2024

• curprev 11:2811:28, 5 October 2024 Superstitionfreeblog talk contribs 8,118 bytes +248 →Input specification ("constraints")

10 October 2023

• curprev 15:1815:18, 10 October 2023 imported>PauliKL 7,870 bytes +442 →Input Specification

30 January 2017

• curprev 00:0800:08, 30 January 2017 rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m 7,428 bytes +22 added a new talk section so as to properly move the TOC to it's proper place.

21 January 2014

• curprev 11:1411:14, 21 January 2014 rosettacode>Gatmo 7,406 bytes +432 →Input Specification

1 November 2013

• curprev 16:0516:05, 1 November 2013 rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger 6,974 bytes +483 →REXX: added a new section. -- ~~~~

16 January 2012

• curprev 03:2003:20, 16 January 2012 rosettacode>Crazyfirex 6,491 bytes +320 →LabVIEW: new section

26 September 2011

• curprev 18:0918:09, 26 September 2011 rosettacode>Paddy3118 6,171 bytes +279 →Fabula?: Thanks for the ref.
• curprev 17:4717:47, 26 September 2011 rosettacode>Kernigh 5,892 bytes +198 →Fabula?: [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fabula ''Fabula''] is a Latin word for "story". Wikipedia's article "fabula and syuzhet" is not relevant. --~~~~
• curprev 03:5303:53, 26 September 2011 rosettacode>Ledrug 5,694 bytes +400 →Input Specification
• curprev 03:5103:51, 26 September 2011 rosettacode>Mwn3d 5,294 bytes +281 →Fabula?: Try Google
• curprev 03:2103:21, 26 September 2011 rosettacode>Paddy3118 5,013 bytes +392 →Input Specification: Termination
• curprev 03:1103:11, 26 September 2011 rosettacode>Paddy3118 4,621 bytes +124 →Fabula?: Delete it?
• curprev 03:0903:09, 26 September 2011 rosettacode>Paddy3118 4,497 bytes +292 →Fabula: What does the word mean?

25 September 2011

• curprev 16:4516:45, 25 September 2011 rosettacode>Ledrug 4,205 bytes +116 →Input Specification: maybe? (maybe not?)
• curprev 16:2116:21, 25 September 2011 rosettacode>Mwn3d 4,089 bytes +240 →Input Specification: does it really matter?
• curprev 16:0216:02, 25 September 2011 rosettacode>PauliKL 3,849 bytes +417 →Input Specification: Many implementations are incorrect.

13 May 2010

• curprev 14:3714:37, 13 May 2010 rosettacode>Axtens m 3,432 bytes +92 →Input specification ("constraints")
• curprev 10:3010:30, 13 May 2010 Rdm talk contribs 3,340 bytes +327 →Input specification ("constraints")
• curprev 10:2210:22, 13 May 2010 rosettacode>Hypftier 3,013 bytes +961 →Input specification ("constraints")
• curprev 06:3006:30, 13 May 2010 rosettacode>ShinTakezou 2,052 bytes +306 →Input Specification: A, B in [-1000, 1000] ?

8 April 2010

• curprev 23:2723:27, 8 April 2010 rosettacode>Dkf 1,746 bytes +394 →Input Specification
• curprev 21:4621:46, 8 April 2010 rosettacode>Paddy3118 1,352 bytes +91 →Formatting
• curprev 21:3021:30, 8 April 2010 rosettacode>Dcsobral 1,261 bytes +526 About the input
• curprev 19:5619:56, 8 April 2010 rosettacode>Dkf 735 bytes +196 →Formatting: I woz ere!
• curprev 18:4818:48, 8 April 2010 rosettacode>Paddy3118 539 bytes +372 No edit summary
• curprev 16:4916:49, 8 April 2010 MikeMol talk contribs 167 bytes +167 I like this one for its simplicity.